The stack
One codebase. Both stores. And someone who has handled the rejections before.
Anyone can write an app. What actually costs you a launch date is the store rejection two days before release, the SDK that went out of support, and the signing certificate nobody can find.
What is specified, not assumed
- Codebase
- 1 · React Native
- Targets
- iOS 15+ · Android 8+
- Store review
- handled end to end
- Distribution
- App Store · Play · MDM
FIG. 1 — Mobile
What we ship in this layer
Cross-platform apps
One React Native codebase, both stores. You get an app that feels native on each platform without paying to build it twice.
Store release & review
App Store and Google Play submission, policy handling, and the rejections dealt with — so a launch date stays a launch date.
Push & in-app messaging
Notifications people opt into rather than mute, segmented properly and measured against whether they actually bring anyone back.
Payments & subscriptions
StoreKit, Play Billing and RevenueCat wired so renewals, upgrades, refunds and receipts all behave the way finance expects.
Analytics & funnels
Firebase instrumented around the decisions you need to make, not every event that could be logged. Drop-off you can see.
Enterprise distribution
NewMDM, TestFlight and managed Play for apps that never touch a public store — internal tools shipped to staff devices.
App modernization
NewNative to React Native, SDK and OS-target upgrades, and the dependency debt that has been blocking releases for months.
Enterprise distribution
MDM, TestFlight and managed Play for apps that never touch a public store. Internal tools shipped straight to staff devices, with the enrolment and the provisioning handled.
Not one competitor in the Swedish benchmark lists this.
Usually goes with
Say what is broken. Or what is missing.
One number and one date come back in writing, from the person who will do the work. Nothing starts, and nothing is owed, until you approve.